--- title: "Construction Expert's Opinions Regarding the Rebuilding Costs Admitted" meta: "og:description": "The expert has firsthand knowledge of actual costs for construction in the local area" "og:title": "Construction Expert's Opinions Regarding the Rebuilding Costs Admitted" author: "Expert Witness Profiler" description: "The expert has firsthand knowledge of actual costs for construction in the local area" --- # Construction Expert's Opinions Regarding the Rebuilding Costs Admitted Posted on August 20, 2025 by Expert Witness Profiler On March 4, 2023, Plaintiff Jane Randall’s son, Christian Randall, set fire to her home on Lady’s Island in Beaufort, South Carolina. On January 26, 2025, Plaintiff identified [David Johnson](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/David-Johnson/1567198) as an expert general contractor to testify regarding the extent of damage to Plaintiff’s home and the need to demolish and rebuild the property at a cost of approximately $2.2 million. Defendant Allstate Insurance Company argued that Johnson's opinions regarding the cost of rebuilding Plaintiff's home are "nothing but speculation, conjecture and a lack of formalized testing." ## **Construction Expert Witness** [David Johnson](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/David-Johnson/1567198) has over two decades of experience as a licensed general contractor in both North and South Carolina. He has been in the homebuilding construction business since 1971 and has served as a project manager for many residential properties in Beaufort County. As both a licensed realtor and a licensed general contractor, he has extensive experience in assessing property values and damage costs. [Get the full story on challenges to David Johnson's expert opinions and testimony with an in-depth Challenge Study](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/order/add?eId=1567198&pId=3). ## **Discussion by the Court** After a careful review of Johnson's deposition, the arguments of the parties, and [Rule 702](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre/rule_702#:~:text=Rule%20702%20sets%20forth%20the,is%20a%20relatively%20narrow%20inquiry.) standards, the Court found that Johnson's testimony is sufficiently reliable and would be helpful to the jury if called upon to determine damages in this case. Johnson has sixteen years of experience as a general contractor in the area and has firsthand knowledge of construction costs. He has consulted with an architect and structural engineer and provided an estimate that the rebuilding of the home would cost around $395 per square foot, which is at the low range of square foot costs in the area. Johnson's use of a per square foot metric to estimate rebuilding costs is a reasonable method utilized in his business. Defendant accurately noted that the estimate provided by Johnson is not based on final architectural blueprints and that the square foot number he utilized was based on information provided by Plaintiff. These issues go to the weight and not the admissibility of the expert testimony. Defendant will have every opportunity to cross examine Johnson at trial and identify any weaknesses or questions about his opinions. The Court found, however, at this point, Plaintiff has carried her burden of showing by a preponderance of the evidence that Johnson's opinions are sufficiently reliable, based upon reasonable methods, and would be helpful to the jury should damages be an issue at trial. ## **Held** The Court denied the Defendant's motion to exclude David Johnson as an expert witness under Rule 702. ## **Key Takeaway**: Johnson's opinions are based on personal experience as a general contractor in the Beaufort County area, consultation with an architect and structural engineer, personal inspection of the fire damaged home, firsthand knowledge of actual costs for construction in the local area, and the use of a cost per square foot metric.  ## **Case Details:** --- ## **You Might Also Like** ![Law And Legal Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Claims Handling Customs ](https://media.jurimatic.com/images/Expert_Witness_Profiler1.webp) [**Law And Legal Expert Was Allowed to Opine on Claims Handling Customs **](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/construction-experts-opinions-regarding-the-rebuilding-costs-admitted/law-and-legal-expert-was-allowed-to-opine-on-claims-handling-customs-)![Psychology Expert's Testimony About PICS Limited](https://media.jurimatic.com/images/blog_pic_640X4801.webp) [**Psychology Expert's Testimony About PICS Limited**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/construction-experts-opinions-regarding-the-rebuilding-costs-admitted/psychology-experts-testimony-about-pics-limited)![Finance Expert Allowed to Opine on Damages and Disgorgement](https://media.jurimatic.com/images/blog_pic_640X480_2026_07_23T203933_056.webp) [**Finance Expert Allowed to Opine on Damages and Disgorgement**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/construction-experts-opinions-regarding-the-rebuilding-costs-admitted/finance-expert-allowed-to-opine-on-damages-and-disgorgement)![Psychology Expert Allowed to Opine on False Confessions](https://media.jurimatic.com/images/blog_pic_640X480_2026_07_21T175218_265.webp) [**Psychology Expert Allowed to Opine on False Confessions**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/construction-experts-opinions-regarding-the-rebuilding-costs-admitted/psychology-expert-allowed-to-opine-on-false-confessions)![Privacy Expert Was Not Allowed to Opine on ECPA and SCA](https://media.jurimatic.com/images/blog_pic_640X480_2026_07_22T201120_732.webp) [**Privacy Expert Was Not Allowed to Opine on ECPA and SCA**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/construction-experts-opinions-regarding-the-rebuilding-costs-admitted/privacy-expert-was-not-allowed-to-opine-on-ecpa-and-sca)