--- title: "Radiology Expert was Allowed to Opine on the Extent of the Injuries" meta: "og:description": "The radiology expert was barred from testifying beyond the scope of his medical records" "og:title": "Radiology Expert was Allowed to Opine on the Extent of the Injuries" author: "Expert Witness Profiler" description: "The radiology expert was barred from testifying beyond the scope of his medical records" --- # Radiology Expert was Allowed to Opine on the Extent of the Injuries Posted on April 17, 2026 by Expert Witness Profiler Plaintiff Sheli D. Milam Sams and Dr. Bradley Sams had Safeco Policy No. F335202 (“the Policy”) that included underinsured motorists (“UIM”) coverage. On February 13, 2021, Plaintiff was involved in an automobile accident in Colorado. The other driver, Semega Mahamadou, was at fault, and Mahamadou’s vehicle had an Allstate policy. Mahamadou’s Allstate policy had liability limits of $25,000 per person, and Allstate paid Plaintiff $25,000. Plaintiff’s sole formal doctor’s visit involved an x-ray in 2021. Dr. Charles Menendez interpreted the x-ray as showing a nondisplaced sternal fracture. Plaintiff’s husband provided treatment to her over the course of her recovery. Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois (“Safeco”) sought to exclude or limit Sams’ designated experts, Dr. [Charles Menendez](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Charles-Menendez/1574014) and Plaintiff’s husband, Dr. [Bradley Sams](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Bradley-Sams/1574015). Plaintiff argued that they acted as treating physicians. ## **Radiology Expert Witness** [Charles Menendez](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Charles-Menendez/1574014) is a board-certified radiologist who specializes in the general practice of radiology. [Get the full story on challenges to Charles Menendez’s expert opinions and testimony with an in-depth Challenge Study](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/order/add?eId=1574014&pId=3). ## **Obstetrics and Gynecology Expert Witness** [Bradley C. Sams](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Bradley-Sams/1574015) received his medical degree and completed his residency training in obstetrics and gynecology at Louisiana State University Health Science Center. Sams is a member of the Mississippi Medical Association, the American College of Phlebology, and the American Association of Bariatric Physicians. [Want to know more about the challenges Bradley Sams has faced? Get the full details with our Challenge Study report.](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/order/add?eId=1574015&pId=3) ## **Discussion by the Court** The parties contest whether Plaintiff properly disclosed her designated experts as treating physicians. Plaintiff designated Menendez as a treating physician, so he was not required to provide a written report. But if a treating physician does not provide a written report, the physician’s testimony will be limited to opinions acquired based on the physician’s personal knowledge of the examination, diagnosis and treatment of a patient and not from information acquired from outside sources. Menendez did not provide a written report, so any testimony he offers will be limited to be personal knowledge contained in his medical records and cannot come from information acquired from outside sources. In contrast to Menendez, Sams’ disclosure as a treating physician did not satisfy [Rule 26](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_26). A Plaintiff must provide more information than the treating physician’s facts, data, and symptoms he observed in his patients during treatment. Plaintiff provided no medical records from Sams which contain his expected testimony or a written report for that matter. Alternatively, the Court determined that Sams admitted that he rendered no formal medical treatment to Plaintiff; this admission took Sams outside the scope of testifying as a treating physician, so he cannot satisfy Rule 26(a)(2)(C). ## **Held** The Court granted in part and denied in part Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois’ motion to exclude or limit the testimony of Charles Menendez and Bradley Sams. ## **Key Takeaway** A court considers the importance of the witnesses’ testimony. Because Sams did not render formal medical treatment to Plaintiff, his alleged expert testimony is not important. Besides, failure to properly disclose an expected expert’s testimony is grounds for prohibiting introduction of that evidence at trial. ## **Case Details:** --- ## **You Might Also Like** ![Radiology Expert was Allowed to Opine on the Extent of the Injuries](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/blog-pic-640X480-2026-04-17T212119.557.jpg) [**Radiology Expert was Allowed to Opine on the Extent of the Injuries**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/radiology-expert-was-allowed-to-opine-on-the-extent-of-the-injuries/radiology-expert-was-allowed-to-opine-on-the-extent-of-the-injuries)![Radiology Expert Allowed to Opine on Emergency Care](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/blog-pic-640X480-2026-04-17T151703.135.jpg) [**Radiology Expert Allowed to Opine on Emergency Care**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/radiology-expert-was-allowed-to-opine-on-the-extent-of-the-injuries/radiology-expert-allowed-to-opine-on-emergency-care)![Human Factors Expert Not Allowed to Opine on Warning Cues](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/blog-pic-640X480-2026-04-17T191943.820.jpg) [**Human Factors Expert Not Allowed to Opine on Warning Cues**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/radiology-expert-was-allowed-to-opine-on-the-extent-of-the-injuries/human-factors-expert-not-allowed-to-opine-on-warning-cues)![Accident Reconstruction Expert's Testimony on Design Defects Excluded](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/blog-pic-640X480-2026-04-16T184712.490.jpg) [**Accident Reconstruction Expert’s Testimony on Design Defects Excluded**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/radiology-expert-was-allowed-to-opine-on-the-extent-of-the-injuries/accident-reconstruction-experts-testimony-on-design-defects-excluded)![Architecture Expert Allowed to Opine on Storm Damage](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/blog-pic-640X480-2026-04-14T214142.934.jpg) [**Architecture Expert Allowed to Opine on Storm Damage**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/radiology-expert-was-allowed-to-opine-on-the-extent-of-the-injuries/architecture-expert-allowed-to-opine-on-storm-damage)