---
title: "Forensic Engineering Expert’s Testimony on Interior and Roof Damages Admitted"
meta:
  "og:description": "The forensic engineering expert was allowed to testify because he evaluated the data, inspected the home himself, and made calculations"
  "og:title": "Forensic Engineering Expert’s Testimony on Interior and Roof Damages Admitted"
  author: "Expert Witness Profiler"
  description: "The forensic engineering expert was allowed to testify because he evaluated the data, inspected the home himself, and made calculations"
---

# Forensic Engineering Expert’s Testimony on Interior and Roof Damages Admitted

Posted on September 4, 2025 by Expert Witness Profiler

This case arose from a dispute between homeowners and their insurer over coverage. Plaintiffs, Jessi Shetler and Richard Shetler filed a claim with Defendant, Clear Blue Specialty Insurance Company, their insurer, for the windstorm’s damage to their roof and the interior of their home.

Plaintiffs brought the instant first-party action sounding in breach of contractdue to Defendant’s denial of all roofing system damages and undervaluation of the Plaintiff’s insurance claim.

Plaintiffs’ expert, forensic engineer [Sonny Gulati](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Sunil-Gulati/1535229), opined that Plaintiffs’ roof and interior “suffered significant storm related and widespread damage” such that the roof needs to be completely replaced and the interior repaired. However, the Defendants filed a _[Daubert](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/daubert_standard)_ motion to exclude the testimony of Gulati.

## **Forensic Engineering Expert Witness**

[Sunil Sonny Gulati](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Sunil-Gulati/1535229) has over 30 years’ experience in conducting structural/geotechnical investigations including sinkhole evaluations, ground penetrating radar (GPR) testing and analysis, geotechnical design, environmental consulting, construction materials testing, supervision, and roadway construction project management.

[Want to know more about the challenges Sonny Gulati has faced? Get the full details with our Challenge Study report](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/order/add?eId=1535229&amp;pId=3). 

## **Discussion by the Court**

Basically, Gulati opined that Plaintiffs’ roof and interior “suffered significant storm related and widespread damage” such that the roof needs to be completely replaced and the interior repaired.

In forming this opinion, Gulati reviewed weather data, calculated wind forces, inspected the property, interviewed Plaintiff Richard Shetler, and reviewed documentation including prior evaluations, photos, and a wind history report.

Defendants argued that Gulati’s methodology is unreliable and his testimony unhelpful because he leaned too heavily on Richard Shetler’s interview to determine that the windstorm caused the damage to Plaintiffs’ home.

The Court disagreed because Gulati evaluated data, inspected the home himself, and made calculations of the same type that courts regularly find sufficiently reliable. Any weaknesses in his evaluation, such as overreliance on a biased homeowner, are better addressed through cross-examination, not exclusion, as the jury is best equipped to make credibility determinations. To sum up, Gulati’s methodology is sufficiently reliable to put before a jury, and his testimony will be helpful for the same reasons.

## **Held**

The Court denied the Defendant’s _Daubert_ motion to exclude the testimony of Sonny Gulati.

## **Key Takeaway**:

Experts and their opinions need not be perfect to be admissible, and “it is not the role of the district court to make ultimate conclusions as to the persuasiveness of the proffered evidence.” In other words, forensic experts who rely on weather data, engineering formulas, home inspections, and their own knowledge and experience are sufficiently reliable.

## **Case Details:**

---

## **You Might Also Like**

![Intellectual Property Expert&#39;s Opinion on Misappropriation Excluded](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/blog-pic-640X480-2026-03-13T205412.117.jpg) [**Intellectual Property Expert’s Opinion on Misappropriation Excluded**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/forensic-engineering-experts-testimony-on-interior-and-roof-damages-admitted/intellectual-property-experts-opinion-on-misappropriation-excluded)![Automotive Industry Expert&#39;s Testimony on Pricing Practices Excluded](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/blog-pic-640X480-2026-03-13T191143.335.jpg) [**Automotive Industry Expert’s Testimony on Pricing Practices Excluded**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/forensic-engineering-experts-testimony-on-interior-and-roof-damages-admitted/automotive-industry-experts-testimony-on-pricing-practices-excluded)![Consumer Credit Expert Allowed to Opine on Mixed Files](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/blog-pic-640X480-2026-03-13T160600.039.jpg) [**Consumer Credit Expert Allowed to Opine on Mixed Files**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/forensic-engineering-experts-testimony-on-interior-and-roof-damages-admitted/consumer-credit-expert-allowed-to-opine-on-mixed-files)![Appraisal Expert&#39;s Testimony on Deceptiveness Excluded](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/blog-pic-640X480-2026-03-11T194055.299.jpg) [**Appraisal Expert’s Testimony on Deceptiveness Excluded**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/forensic-engineering-experts-testimony-on-interior-and-roof-damages-admitted/appraisal-experts-testimony-on-deceptiveness-excluded)![Psychology Expert Allowed to Opine on EMDR Therapy](https://ewp-blog.expertwitnessprofiler.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/03/blog-pic-640X480-2026-03-11T153456.164.jpg) [**Psychology Expert Allowed to Opine on EMDR Therapy**](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/forensic-engineering-experts-testimony-on-interior-and-roof-damages-admitted/psychology-expert-allowed-to-opine-on-emdr-therapy)