Results for:
William W. Funderburke
William W. Funderburke
Accounting
Richmond, Virginia
If you're not satisfied, we don't expect you to pay.
That's our commitment and your guarantee. Simply ask for a refund.
Disclaimer
We are an independent data provider, compiling expert witness information from court websites, public records, and third-party sources. We do not employ, endorse, or have any affiliation with the experts profiled. This page is not a means to contact the expert directly.
Expert Details
Funderburke’s forensic accounting work frequently involves analyzing insurance policy scenarios and providing support in claim resolution. His background includes consulting for attorneys and government agencies on fraud investigations and litigation matters. From 2016 to 2017, he worked with Kapila Mukamal on cases involving Ponzi schemes, embezzlement, and asset misappropriation, providing confidential consulting for the SEC, FBI, FTC, and FDIC. Prior to that, he spent seven years at Matson, Driscoll & Damico, where he participated in business income, extra expense, and litigation engagements.
He has recent deposition experience in Greenfield Prop Owner II, LLC v. Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Company of America (2022–2023), in the United States District Court, Northern District of California.
Funderburke is a Certified Public Accountant (since 2015) and Certified Fraud Examiner (since 2010). He earned a Bachelor of Business Administration in Accounting from Georgia College & State University in 2008 and completed additional coursework at Georgia State University in accounting and risk management.
The Preliminary Screening Report (PSR) gives you both a snapshot of an expert’s testimonial history and an accurate assessment of how prolific a testifier that expert has been in the past. Most importantly, it is a tool to help you determine if there is enough information available regarding the expert to justify the investment in a full Expert Witness Profile.
Read More
Learn about cases where an expert has been challenged under Daubert or their testimony has been criticized by the judge or the opposing party. See the grounds for such challenges, their outcomes (where available) and citations to underlying documents. The Challenge Study includes direct challenges to experts as well as instances where the expert’s testimony/ affidavit was submitted in support or against a motion.
Read More
The Expert Witness Profile is the most comprehensive and cost-effective background report on an expert witness in the United States today. The product is used by lawyers, law librarians and paralegals practicing in every area of law and by the widest array of organizations: from AMLAW 100 law firms to sole practitioners to national associations of attorneys to expert search firms and even by expert witnesses themselves.