Results for:
Susan (“Sue”) M. Peters
Susan (“Sue”) M. Peters
Litigation (NEC), Law Enforcement, Police Practices, Private Investigation
Davenport, Washington
If you're not satisfied, we don't expect you to pay.
That's our commitment and your guarantee. Simply ask for a refund.
Disclaimer
We are an independent data provider, compiling expert witness information from court websites, public records, and third-party sources. We do not employ, endorse, or have any affiliation with the experts profiled. This page is not a means to contact the expert directly.
Expert Details
Peters has provided expert testimony in numerous civil and criminal matters across multiple jurisdictions. Recent cases include depositions in Fletcher v City of Chicago (2024), Estate of TJ v State of Washington (2024), and Fair v King County (2024). She has also testified in federal and state courts, including McCann v Constantine Police Department and United States v Palofex, et al.
She holds a Bachelor’s degree in Criminal Justice from Central Washington University and has completed extensive training in use-of-force, internal investigations, and excited delirium. Peters maintains active memberships in professional organizations such as the Washington Association of Legal Investigators and the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Her background includes work on high-profile homicide cases and guest speaking engagements at legal and academic institutions.
A previous Expert Challenge Study on Susan (“Sue”) M. Peters revealed:
| Total Challenges | 3 |
|---|---|
| Direct Challenges | 3 |
| Indirect Challenges | 0 |
The Preliminary Screening Report (PSR) gives you both a snapshot of an expert’s testimonial history and an accurate assessment of how prolific a testifier that expert has been in the past. Most importantly, it is a tool to help you determine if there is enough information available regarding the expert to justify the investment in a full Expert Witness Profile.
Read More
Learn about cases where an expert has been challenged under Daubert or their testimony has been criticized by the judge or the opposing party. See the grounds for such challenges, their outcomes (where available) and citations to underlying documents. The Challenge Study includes direct challenges to experts as well as instances where the expert’s testimony/ affidavit was submitted in support or against a motion.
Read More
The Expert Witness Profile is the most comprehensive and cost-effective background report on an expert witness in the United States today. The product is used by lawyers, law librarians and paralegals practicing in every area of law and by the widest array of organizations: from AMLAW 100 law firms to sole practitioners to national associations of attorneys to expert search firms and even by expert witnesses themselves.