Results for: Anthony Owusu
San Antonio, Texas
we don't expect you to pay.
That's our commitment and your guarantee. Simply ask for a refund.
Dr. Anthony Owusu, Jr., M.D., is an orthopedic surgery expert witness from Texas. He earned his M.D. in 2008 from Howard University College of Medicine. He further completed his residencies from Medical College of Virginia and Howard University College of Medicine and his fellowship from Texas Back Institute in Dallas, Texas. He has a physician’s license from the state of Texas and is certified by the American Board of Orthopedic Surgery.
Currently, Dr. Owusu is an orthopedic spine surgeon at Next Generation Orthopedic & Spine Institute.
A previous Expert Challenge Study on Anthony Owusu's revealed:
Preliminary Screening Report
- Affidavits and Reports
- Federal Agency Decisions
- Jury Verdict Reports
- State Agency Decisions
- Transcripts and Depositions
Expert Challenge Study
- The expert was deemed not qualified (unqualified).
- The expert’s methods were questionable, suspicious, not valid (invalid), lacking or inadequate.
- The expert was not credible (incredible) or believable (unbelievable).
- The testimony was outside the scope of the expertise of the expert.
- The testimony was not relevant (irrelevant).
- The testimony was not reliable (unreliable).
- The testimony was flawed.
- The expert’s methods were not scientific (unscientific).
- The testimony was speculative.
- The expert was deemed not competent, incompetent.
- The testimony was questionable.
- The testimony was predicated on an improper (or was lacking) foundation, basis or grounds.
- The testimony was based on insufficient evidence, false assumptions or evidence not in the record.
- The expert drew conclusions not supported by the evidence.
- The testimony of the expert was impeached.
- The testimony was based on methods which were unscientific (not scientific, junk science).
- The testimony would not assist the trier of fact.
- The testimony was, amounted to or drew a legal conclusion.
- The testimony was used to support a motion for summary judgment and the motion was granted/ denied.
- The testimony or opinion was conclusory.