Expert Witness Profiler | Deep Research and Background Information on Experts

Results for:

Andrew Han-Tse Woo

Andrew Han-Tse Woo

Neurology

Santa Monica, California
money_back

If you're not satisfied, we don't expect you to pay.

That's our commitment and your guarantee. Simply ask for a refund.

Expert Details
An expert in Neurology, Dr. Andrew Han-Tse Woo M.D. has been retained as an expert witness in cases related to Negligence, Medical Malpractice etc.. Based on our previous research and publicly available records, Bryan Foster, Susan Bryant-Deason, Carolyn Kuhl, Cary Nishimoto, David Sotelo, Dudley W. Gray, II, Gregory Keosian, Michael Harwin, Michael J. Raphael, And Rafael A. Ongkeko etc. are some of the judges who have presided over cases where Andrew Woo has been involved as an expert witness. Woo has the experience of working in courts like Court Of Appeal, Second District, California, Division One, California State, Los Angeles County, Superior Court, Court Of Appeal, Fourth District, California, Division Two, CA Superior - San Bernardino, Superior Court Of California, Central District, Los Angeles County in the states of California.

This is only a representative list and more details are included in our Expert Witness Profiles and Expert Challenge Study. These include details about whether the testimony was challenged or not, which party retained the expert, who were the attorneys representing the parties in the case.

A previous Expert Challenge Study on Andrew Han-Tse Woo's revealed:

Total Challenges17
Direct Challenges8
Indirect Challenges 9
Preliminary Screening Report

The Preliminary Screening Report (PSR) gives you both a snapshot of an expert’s testimonial history and an accurate assessment of how prolific a testifier that expert has been in the past. Most importantly, it is a tool to help you determine if there is enough information available regarding the expert to justify the investment in a full Expert Witness Profile.

Read More

Expert Challenge Study

Learn about cases where an expert has been challenged under Daubert or their testimony has been criticized by the judge or the opposing party. See the grounds for such challenges, their outcomes (where available) and citations to underlying documents. The Challenge Study includes direct challenges to experts as well as instances where the expert’s testimony/ affidavit was submitted in support or against a motion.

Read More

Expert Witness Profile

The Expert Witness Profile is the most comprehensive and cost-effective background report on an expert witness in the United States today. The product is used by lawyers, law librarians and paralegals practicing in every area of law and by the widest array of organizations: from AMLAW 100 law firms to sole practitioners to national associations of attorneys to expert search firms and even by expert witnesses themselves.