---
title: "Andrew Pollak | Orthopedic Surgery Expert Witness | Deep Research and Background Information on Experts"
meta:
  "og:description": "Andrew Nathan Pollak is an expert witness in Orthopedic Surgery. View detailed background information and comprehensive legal research data."
  "og:title": "Experts | Expert Witness Profiler | Deep Research and Background Information on Experts"
  description: "Andrew Nathan Pollak is an expert witness in Orthopedic Surgery. View detailed background information and comprehensive legal research data."
---

### **Results for: ** Andrew Nathan Pollak

# **Andrew Nathan Pollak**

Orthopedic Surgery

Timonium, Maryland

![money_back](https://expertwitnessprofiler.com/expert-witness/Andrew-Pollak/1520324/img/moneyback.webp)

If you're not satisfied, we don't expect you to pay.

That's our commitment and your guarantee. Simply ask for a refund.

***Disclaimer***

We are an independent data provider, compiling expert witness information from court websites, public records, and third-party sources. We do not employ, endorse, or have any affiliation with the experts profiled. This page is not a means to contact the expert directly.

Expert Details

**Dr. Andrew Nathan Pollak M.D.** is an expert witness in the field of **Orthopedic Surgery**. Some of the cases where Andrew Pollak has been retained as an expert witness are **Harman V. Fioravanti; SMITH V. CHATHAM; MACK V. CERES MARINE TERMINALS**.  Dr. Andrew Nathan Pollak M.D. has been involved in cases related to Negligence, Personal Injury etc. in the past. These cases have been in front of judges such as Not Mentioned, Paul V. Niemeyer, Michael Luttig, Karen J. Williams, Key Nichols in Circuit Court of Maryland. Baltimore County, Circuit Court, Prince George COUNTY, MARYLAND, United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit..  This is only a representative list of cases where Andrew Pollak has been involved and more information is available in our Expert Witness Profiles and Expert Challenge Study. These include details about whether the testimony was challenged or not, which party retained the expert, who were the attorneys representing the parties in the case.